Selection of the distraction implant length with improved biomechanical properties by three‐dimensional finite element analysis
Identifieur interne : 004522 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 004521; suivant : 004523Selection of the distraction implant length with improved biomechanical properties by three‐dimensional finite element analysis
Auteurs : J. Gao ; T. Li ; X. Hou ; Z. Wang ; L. Kong [République populaire de Chine] ; J. ChenSource :
- Journal of Oral Rehabilitation [ 0305-182X ] ; 2011-04.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Alveolar, Alveolar bone, Alveolar distraction, Alveolar distraction osteogenesis, Alveolar ridge, Alveolar ridge augmentation, Apical portion, Apical support portion, Augmentation, Autogenous bone, Axial force, Bidirectional parameters, Biomechanical, Biomechanical behaviour, Biomechanical characteristics, Biomechanical properties, Blackwell publishing, Bone graft, Bone healing process, Bone height, Bone regeneration, Bone volume, Buccal sides, Buccolingual force, Cancellous, Cancellous bone, Cancellous bones, Central distraction screw, Clinical investigation, Clinical studies, Complex design, Coronal transport portion, Cortical, Cortical bone, Cortical bones, Craniomaxillofac surg, Dental implants, Different lengths, Distraction, Distraction implant, Distraction implant length, Distraction implants, Distraction length, Distraction osteogenesis, Distraction screw, Distractor placement, Donor site morbidity, Edentulous ridges, Experimental study, Favours stress distribution, Implant, Implant dent, Implant insertion, Implant placement, Input variables, Lingual sides, Mandible, Mandibular, Maxillofac, Maxillofacial surgery, Medical university, Mises stress, Nite, Nite element analysis, Nite element method, Operative technique, Oral maxillofac implants, Oral maxillofac surg, Oral pathol, Oral rehabil, Oral surg, Osteogenesis, Output variables, Overall treatment time, Present study, Prospective study, Prosthetic implant, Radiol endod, Regeneration, Response curves, Small size, Stress concentration, Stress distribution, Stress distributions, Surg, Symmetry plane, Titanium abutment, Traditional implant, Traditional implants, Vertical alveolar ridge distraction, Vertical ridge augmentation.
- Teeft :
- Alveolar, Alveolar bone, Alveolar distraction, Alveolar distraction osteogenesis, Alveolar ridge, Alveolar ridge augmentation, Apical portion, Apical support portion, Augmentation, Autogenous bone, Axial force, Bidirectional parameters, Biomechanical, Biomechanical behaviour, Biomechanical characteristics, Biomechanical properties, Blackwell publishing, Bone graft, Bone healing process, Bone height, Bone regeneration, Bone volume, Buccal sides, Buccolingual force, Cancellous, Cancellous bone, Cancellous bones, Central distraction screw, Clinical investigation, Clinical studies, Complex design, Coronal transport portion, Cortical, Cortical bone, Cortical bones, Craniomaxillofac surg, Dental implants, Different lengths, Distraction, Distraction implant, Distraction implant length, Distraction implants, Distraction length, Distraction osteogenesis, Distraction screw, Distractor placement, Donor site morbidity, Edentulous ridges, Experimental study, Favours stress distribution, Implant, Implant dent, Implant insertion, Implant placement, Input variables, Lingual sides, Mandible, Mandibular, Maxillofac, Maxillofacial surgery, Medical university, Mises stress, Nite, Nite element analysis, Nite element method, Operative technique, Oral maxillofac implants, Oral maxillofac surg, Oral pathol, Oral rehabil, Oral surg, Osteogenesis, Output variables, Overall treatment time, Present study, Prospective study, Prosthetic implant, Radiol endod, Regeneration, Response curves, Small size, Stress concentration, Stress distribution, Stress distributions, Surg, Symmetry plane, Titanium abutment, Traditional implant, Traditional implants, Vertical alveolar ridge distraction, Vertical ridge augmentation.
Abstract
Summary In this study, the distraction length of distraction implant was set as input variable which ranged from 2 to 10 mm. The effect of distraction length on the maximum Von Mises stress in the jaw bones and the implant were evaluated by a finite element method. The results showed that under axial load, the maximum equivalent stresses in cortical bone, cancellous bone, and distraction screw decreased by 5·8%, 8·6%, and 11·0%, respectively, with the changing of distraction length, and under buccolingual load those decreased by 0·3%, 18·0%, and 13·0%, respectively. The data indicate that cancellous bone is more sensitive to distraction length than the cortical bone. Under both loads, the central distraction screw was subjected to the stress concentration and more easily damaged by buccolingual force than by axial force. Distraction implant with distraction length exceeding 8 mm showed relatively better biomechanical behaviour.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02154.x
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 004D58
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 004D58
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 001466
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 004550
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 004522
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Selection of the distraction implant length with improved biomechanical properties by three‐dimensional finite element analysis</title>
<author><name sortKey="Gao, J" sort="Gao, J" uniqKey="Gao J" first="J." last="Gao">J. Gao</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Li, T" sort="Li, T" uniqKey="Li T" first="T." last="Li">T. Li</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Hou, X" sort="Hou, X" uniqKey="Hou X" first="X." last="Hou">X. Hou</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Wang, Z" sort="Wang, Z" uniqKey="Wang Z" first="Z." last="Wang">Z. Wang</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Kong, L" sort="Kong, L" uniqKey="Kong L" first="L." last="Kong">L. Kong</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Chen, J" sort="Chen, J" uniqKey="Chen J" first="J." last="Chen">J. Chen</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:9AFD1B1E391D65A9505410DFAAD0F19CD2DB5770</idno>
<date when="2011" year="2011">2011</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02154.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/9AFD1B1E391D65A9505410DFAAD0F19CD2DB5770/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">004D58</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">004D58</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">004D58</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">001466</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">001466</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0305-182X:2011:Gao J:selection:of:the</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">004550</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">004522</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">004522</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Selection of the distraction implant length with improved biomechanical properties by three‐dimensional finite element analysis</title>
<author><name sortKey="Gao, J" sort="Gao, J" uniqKey="Gao J" first="J." last="Gao">J. Gao</name>
<affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="no comma">Departments of Prosthodontics</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Li, T" sort="Li, T" uniqKey="Li T" first="T." last="Li">T. Li</name>
<affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="no comma">Orthodontics</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Hou, X" sort="Hou, X" uniqKey="Hou X" first="X." last="Hou">X. Hou</name>
<affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="no comma">Teaching Centre</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Wang, Z" sort="Wang, Z" uniqKey="Wang Z" first="Z." last="Wang">Z. Wang</name>
<affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="no comma">Laboratory Animal Centre</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Kong, L" sort="Kong, L" uniqKey="Kong L" first="L." last="Kong">L. Kong</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">République populaire de Chine</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Stomatology, the Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Xi’an</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Chen, J" sort="Chen, J" uniqKey="Chen J" first="J." last="Chen">J. Chen</name>
<affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="no comma">Departments of Prosthodontics</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno>
<imprint><biblScope unit="vol">38</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="270">270</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="277">277</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2011-04">2011-04</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar</term>
<term>Alveolar bone</term>
<term>Alveolar distraction</term>
<term>Alveolar distraction osteogenesis</term>
<term>Alveolar ridge</term>
<term>Alveolar ridge augmentation</term>
<term>Apical portion</term>
<term>Apical support portion</term>
<term>Augmentation</term>
<term>Autogenous bone</term>
<term>Axial force</term>
<term>Bidirectional parameters</term>
<term>Biomechanical</term>
<term>Biomechanical behaviour</term>
<term>Biomechanical characteristics</term>
<term>Biomechanical properties</term>
<term>Blackwell publishing</term>
<term>Bone graft</term>
<term>Bone healing process</term>
<term>Bone height</term>
<term>Bone regeneration</term>
<term>Bone volume</term>
<term>Buccal sides</term>
<term>Buccolingual force</term>
<term>Cancellous</term>
<term>Cancellous bone</term>
<term>Cancellous bones</term>
<term>Central distraction screw</term>
<term>Clinical investigation</term>
<term>Clinical studies</term>
<term>Complex design</term>
<term>Coronal transport portion</term>
<term>Cortical</term>
<term>Cortical bone</term>
<term>Cortical bones</term>
<term>Craniomaxillofac surg</term>
<term>Dental implants</term>
<term>Different lengths</term>
<term>Distraction</term>
<term>Distraction implant</term>
<term>Distraction implant length</term>
<term>Distraction implants</term>
<term>Distraction length</term>
<term>Distraction osteogenesis</term>
<term>Distraction screw</term>
<term>Distractor placement</term>
<term>Donor site morbidity</term>
<term>Edentulous ridges</term>
<term>Experimental study</term>
<term>Favours stress distribution</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant dent</term>
<term>Implant insertion</term>
<term>Implant placement</term>
<term>Input variables</term>
<term>Lingual sides</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Mandibular</term>
<term>Maxillofac</term>
<term>Maxillofacial surgery</term>
<term>Medical university</term>
<term>Mises stress</term>
<term>Nite</term>
<term>Nite element analysis</term>
<term>Nite element method</term>
<term>Operative technique</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac implants</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac surg</term>
<term>Oral pathol</term>
<term>Oral rehabil</term>
<term>Oral surg</term>
<term>Osteogenesis</term>
<term>Output variables</term>
<term>Overall treatment time</term>
<term>Present study</term>
<term>Prospective study</term>
<term>Prosthetic implant</term>
<term>Radiol endod</term>
<term>Regeneration</term>
<term>Response curves</term>
<term>Small size</term>
<term>Stress concentration</term>
<term>Stress distribution</term>
<term>Stress distributions</term>
<term>Surg</term>
<term>Symmetry plane</term>
<term>Titanium abutment</term>
<term>Traditional implant</term>
<term>Traditional implants</term>
<term>Vertical alveolar ridge distraction</term>
<term>Vertical ridge augmentation</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar</term>
<term>Alveolar bone</term>
<term>Alveolar distraction</term>
<term>Alveolar distraction osteogenesis</term>
<term>Alveolar ridge</term>
<term>Alveolar ridge augmentation</term>
<term>Apical portion</term>
<term>Apical support portion</term>
<term>Augmentation</term>
<term>Autogenous bone</term>
<term>Axial force</term>
<term>Bidirectional parameters</term>
<term>Biomechanical</term>
<term>Biomechanical behaviour</term>
<term>Biomechanical characteristics</term>
<term>Biomechanical properties</term>
<term>Blackwell publishing</term>
<term>Bone graft</term>
<term>Bone healing process</term>
<term>Bone height</term>
<term>Bone regeneration</term>
<term>Bone volume</term>
<term>Buccal sides</term>
<term>Buccolingual force</term>
<term>Cancellous</term>
<term>Cancellous bone</term>
<term>Cancellous bones</term>
<term>Central distraction screw</term>
<term>Clinical investigation</term>
<term>Clinical studies</term>
<term>Complex design</term>
<term>Coronal transport portion</term>
<term>Cortical</term>
<term>Cortical bone</term>
<term>Cortical bones</term>
<term>Craniomaxillofac surg</term>
<term>Dental implants</term>
<term>Different lengths</term>
<term>Distraction</term>
<term>Distraction implant</term>
<term>Distraction implant length</term>
<term>Distraction implants</term>
<term>Distraction length</term>
<term>Distraction osteogenesis</term>
<term>Distraction screw</term>
<term>Distractor placement</term>
<term>Donor site morbidity</term>
<term>Edentulous ridges</term>
<term>Experimental study</term>
<term>Favours stress distribution</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant dent</term>
<term>Implant insertion</term>
<term>Implant placement</term>
<term>Input variables</term>
<term>Lingual sides</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Mandibular</term>
<term>Maxillofac</term>
<term>Maxillofacial surgery</term>
<term>Medical university</term>
<term>Mises stress</term>
<term>Nite</term>
<term>Nite element analysis</term>
<term>Nite element method</term>
<term>Operative technique</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac implants</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac surg</term>
<term>Oral pathol</term>
<term>Oral rehabil</term>
<term>Oral surg</term>
<term>Osteogenesis</term>
<term>Output variables</term>
<term>Overall treatment time</term>
<term>Present study</term>
<term>Prospective study</term>
<term>Prosthetic implant</term>
<term>Radiol endod</term>
<term>Regeneration</term>
<term>Response curves</term>
<term>Small size</term>
<term>Stress concentration</term>
<term>Stress distribution</term>
<term>Stress distributions</term>
<term>Surg</term>
<term>Symmetry plane</term>
<term>Titanium abutment</term>
<term>Traditional implant</term>
<term>Traditional implants</term>
<term>Vertical alveolar ridge distraction</term>
<term>Vertical ridge augmentation</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract">Summary In this study, the distraction length of distraction implant was set as input variable which ranged from 2 to 10 mm. The effect of distraction length on the maximum Von Mises stress in the jaw bones and the implant were evaluated by a finite element method. The results showed that under axial load, the maximum equivalent stresses in cortical bone, cancellous bone, and distraction screw decreased by 5·8%, 8·6%, and 11·0%, respectively, with the changing of distraction length, and under buccolingual load those decreased by 0·3%, 18·0%, and 13·0%, respectively. The data indicate that cancellous bone is more sensitive to distraction length than the cortical bone. Under both loads, the central distraction screw was subjected to the stress concentration and more easily damaged by buccolingual force than by axial force. Distraction implant with distraction length exceeding 8 mm showed relatively better biomechanical behaviour.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations><list><country><li>République populaire de Chine</li>
</country>
</list>
<tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Chen, J" sort="Chen, J" uniqKey="Chen J" first="J." last="Chen">J. Chen</name>
<name sortKey="Gao, J" sort="Gao, J" uniqKey="Gao J" first="J." last="Gao">J. Gao</name>
<name sortKey="Hou, X" sort="Hou, X" uniqKey="Hou X" first="X." last="Hou">X. Hou</name>
<name sortKey="Li, T" sort="Li, T" uniqKey="Li T" first="T." last="Li">T. Li</name>
<name sortKey="Wang, Z" sort="Wang, Z" uniqKey="Wang Z" first="Z." last="Wang">Z. Wang</name>
</noCountry>
<country name="République populaire de Chine"><noRegion><name sortKey="Kong, L" sort="Kong, L" uniqKey="Kong L" first="L." last="Kong">L. Kong</name>
</noRegion>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004522 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 004522 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= Main |étape= Exploration |type= RBID |clé= ISTEX:9AFD1B1E391D65A9505410DFAAD0F19CD2DB5770 |texte= Selection of the distraction implant length with improved biomechanical properties by three‐dimensional finite element analysis }}
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |